» Site Navigation |
|
|
» Stats |
Members: 823
Threads: 3,355
Posts: 25,485
Top Poster: kgdb (5,478)
|
| Welcome to our newest member, 1964vert |
|
 |

06-28-2009
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Edmonton,AB,CAN
Posts: 284
|
|
|
sweet 63
minimal mmmmmm....
|

06-29-2009
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Brick, NJ
Posts: 1,789
|
|
|
Re: sweet 63
Nice bike, but my eye caught that kicker pedal and magneto and my right knee started to hurt.
Mutt
|

06-29-2009
|
 |
Owner/Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,478
|
|
|
Re: sweet 63
Very nice indeed.
__________________
kgdb
|

06-29-2009
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: corn country Indiana
Posts: 1,089
|
|
|
Re: sweet 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by kgdb
Very nice indeed. 
|
Ditto that! Nice!
Uhhhh... Why, Odin, wherever did you get that bitchin' photo???
__________________
2000 Harley Davidson Superglide
|

06-30-2009
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: LouEvo Ky
Posts: 855
|
|
|
Re: sweet 63
 nice looking old sporty....
I see the old XLF still has a little class......
__________________
HARLEY
Louisville KY
Damn it's good to be back in
Chrome & Black
|

06-30-2009
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Brick, NJ
Posts: 1,789
|
|
|
Re: sweet 63
I don't get it. That hardtail section looks like a bolt on, doesn't follow the lines of the back bone on the frame but it looks so good. So many I have seen look like crap. I wonder what the difference is? Anybody have a therory or an opinion on why that one looks so good.
Mutt
|

06-30-2009
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: I live in Fairport New York.
Posts: 1,110
|
|
|
Re: sweet 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by jerseymutt
I don't get it. That hardtail section looks like a bolt on, doesn't follow the lines of the back bone on the frame but it looks so good. So many I have seen look like crap. I wonder what the difference is? Anybody have a therory or an opinion on why that one looks so good.
Mutt
|
Might just be the photograph itself..... awful dark background.....
Just a theory..... with a lighter background it might show more!
Looks very good to me......anyways!
|

07-02-2009
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Edmonton,AB,CAN
Posts: 284
|
|
Re: sweet 63
I checked out lots of specs on the original and this bike is very close too what came out of milwaukee but with small changes, all black..no fender/rear cut down, after market seat, weld on hardtail.....it just works and you get a cool flat track style.....I can't remember where the hell I found this....XL forum I think, and likely was just 2nd hand post from the member
|

07-04-2009
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 152
|
|
|
Re: sweet 63
got a motor just like it sitting on m y work bench, kicker and mag. still needs to be re buiilt tho. looks cool but i'm with mutt.. knees arn't that fond of it..lol..
|

07-15-2009
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9
|
|
|
Re: sweet 63
the springs off the solo fill in the awful line from the backbone,check out some of the bolt on hardtail sportys on the jockey journal they sure changed my mind about a bolt on hardtail for these bikes,its amazing how much a sprung solo takes your eye away from the backbone line
|
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
|
SWEET (like candy)
|
motherputter |
The bikerforum lounge |
4 |
06-10-2008 01:21 AM |
|
Home Sweet Home!
|
kgdb |
The bikerforum lounge |
6 |
05-02-2008 06:41 AM |
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:48 AM.