I don't get it. That hardtail section looks like a bolt on, doesn't follow the lines of the back bone on the frame but it looks so good. So many I have seen look like crap. I wonder what the difference is? Anybody have a therory or an opinion on why that one looks so good.
I don't get it. That hardtail section looks like a bolt on, doesn't follow the lines of the back bone on the frame but it looks so good. So many I have seen look like crap. I wonder what the difference is? Anybody have a therory or an opinion on why that one looks so good.
Mutt
Might just be the photograph itself..... awful dark background.....
Just a theory..... with a lighter background it might show more!
I checked out lots of specs on the original and this bike is very close too what came out of milwaukee but with small changes, all black..no fender/rear cut down, after market seat, weld on hardtail.....it just works and you get a cool flat track style.....I can't remember where the hell I found this....XL forum I think, and likely was just 2nd hand post from the member
got a motor just like it sitting on m y work bench, kicker and mag. still needs to be re buiilt tho. looks cool but i'm with mutt.. knees arn't that fond of it..lol..
the springs off the solo fill in the awful line from the backbone,check out some of the bolt on hardtail sportys on the jockey journal they sure changed my mind about a bolt on hardtail for these bikes,its amazing how much a sprung solo takes your eye away from the backbone line
2000 Harley Davidson Superglide
nice looking old sporty....
Re: sweet 63
Linear Mode
